Ibraimov v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ibraimov v. State

760 So. 2d 291, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7183, 2000 WL 762274

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 14, 2000·No. No. 2D99-2538·Published

Opinion

GREEN, Judge.

We affirm the D.U.I. manslaughter conviction and sentence of appellant, Atije Ibraimov, because the blood-alcohol evidence met the Robertson standard referenced in State v. Townsend, 746 So.2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), and State v. Miles, 732 So.2d 350 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). See Robertson v. State, 604 So.2d 783 (Fla. 1992). Therefore, the jury was properly instructed on the presumptions of impairment set forth in section 316.1934(2), Florida Statutes (1997).

We have also reviewed appellant’s contention that her trial should have been [292] severed from that of her codefendant and find no error.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GREEN, Judge.

We affirm the D.U.I. manslaughter conviction and sentence of appellant, Atije Ibraimov, because the blood-alcohol evidence met the Robertson standard referenced in State v. Townsend, 746 So.2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), and State v. Miles, 732 So.2d 350 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). See Robertson v. State, 604 So.2d 783 (Fla. 1992). Therefore, the jury was properly instructed on the presumptions of impairment set forth in section 316.1934(2), Florida Statutes (1997).

We have also reviewed appellant’s contention that her trial should have been [292] severed from that of her codefendant and find no error.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.

Ibraimov v. State, 760 So. 2d 291, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7183, 2000 WL 762274 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

760 So. 2d 291 (Ibraimov v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related