Ibrahim v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Ninth Circuit

Ibrahim v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

878 F.3d 703

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedDecember 29, 2017

DocketNos. 14-16161 14-17272

StatusPublished

This text of 878 F.3d 703 (Ibrahim v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ibrahim v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 878 F.3d 703 (9th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered- that these-cases be reheard en banc-pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) - and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in these cases shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Graber, Murguia, Owens, and Friedland did not participate in the deliberations or vote in these cases.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered- that these-cases be reheard en banc-pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) - and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in these cases shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Graber, Murguia, Owens, and Friedland did not participate in the deliberations or vote in these cases.'

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

878 F.3d 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ibrahim-v-us-department-of-homeland-security-ca9-2017.