Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ibrahim v. Jenne

Ibrahim v. Jenne

730 So. 2d 408, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4708, 1999 WL 212853
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 9, 1999
DocketNo. 99-1156
StatusPublished

This text of 730 So. 2d 408 (Ibrahim v. Jenne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ibrahim v. Jenne, 730 So. 2d 408, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4708, 1999 WL 212853 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

[409]*409PER CURIAM.

We sua sponte treat the petition for writ of habeas corpus as an appeal from the trial court’s adjudication and sentence of criminal contempt. We reverse and remand because the due process rights provided in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840 for criminal contempt were not followed. Baker v. Green, 732 So.2d 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Haynes v. State, 695 So.2d 371 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The clerk is directed to issue the mandate concurrently with this opinion.

STONE, C.J., GUNTHER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. Green
732 So. 2d 6 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Haynes v. State
695 So. 2d 371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
730 So. 2d 408, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4708, 1999 WL 212853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ibrahim-v-jenne-fladistctapp-1999.