Ibrahim v. Jenne

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ibrahim v. Jenne

730 So. 2d 408, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4708, 1999 WL 212853

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 1999·No. No. 99-1156·Published

Opinion

[409]*409PER CURIAM.

We sua sponte treat the petition for writ of habeas corpus as an appeal from the trial court’s adjudication and sentence of criminal contempt. We reverse and remand because the due process rights provided in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840 for criminal contempt were not followed. Baker v. Green, 732 So.2d 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Haynes v. State, 695 So.2d 371 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The clerk is directed to issue the mandate concurrently with this opinion.

STONE, C.J., GUNTHER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[409]*409PER CURIAM.

We sua sponte treat the petition for writ of habeas corpus as an appeal from the trial court’s adjudication and sentence of criminal contempt. We reverse and remand because the due process rights provided in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840 for criminal contempt were not followed. Baker v. Green, 732 So.2d 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Haynes v. State, 695 So.2d 371 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The clerk is directed to issue the mandate concurrently with this opinion.

STONE, C.J., GUNTHER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Ibrahim v. Jenne, 730 So. 2d 408, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4708, 1999 WL 212853 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

730 So. 2d 408 (Ibrahim v. Jenne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related