Ibn-Tamas v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Ibn-Tamas v. United States

368 A.2d 520, 1977 D.C. App. LEXIS 399

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 5, 1977

DocketNo. 11466

StatusPublished

This text of 368 A.2d 520 (Ibn-Tamas v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ibn-Tamas v. United States, 368 A.2d 520, 1977 D.C. App. LEXIS 399 (D.C. 1977).

Pincite

Opinions

JUDGMENT

Before NEBEKER, Associate Judge, and REILLY, Chief Judge, Retired, and PAIR, Associate Judge, Retired.

PER CURIAM.

. On December 9, 1976, this court entered an order requesting the trial court to reconsider the matter of release pending imposition of sentence in this second-degree murder case and there has now been filed the order of the trial judge of December 10, 1976, a supplemental record containing the presentence report and supplemental matter submitted by the parties. Upon consideration thereof and this court having determined it is unable to conclude that the proceedings below fail to support the ruling of the trial court on appeal herein, it is

[521]*521ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the order on appeal is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

Before NEBEKER, Associate Judge, and REILLY, Chief Judge, Retired, and PAIR, Associate Judge, Retired.

PER CURIAM.

. On December 9, 1976, this court entered an order requesting the trial court to reconsider the matter of release pending imposition of sentence in this second-degree murder case and there has now been filed the order of the trial judge of December 10, 1976, a supplemental record containing the presentence report and supplemental matter submitted by the parties. Upon consideration thereof and this court having determined it is unable to conclude that the proceedings below fail to support the ruling of the trial court on appeal herein, it is

[521]*521ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the order on appeal is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

368 A.2d 520, 1977 D.C. App. LEXIS 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ibn-tamas-v-united-states-dc-1977.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack