Ibert v. Ætna Life Ins.

E.D. New York

Ibert v. Ætna Life Ins.

213 F. 996, 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1017

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York

DecidedMay 4, 1914

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 213 F. 996 (Ibert v. Ætna Life Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ibert v. Ætna Life Ins., 213 F. 996, 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1017 (E.D.N.Y. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

The plaintiff retained an attorney to bring suit under an agreement for one-third of the proceeds. Action under this was brought by another attorney, through arrangement of which the plaintiff was not informed, but which she ratified by verifying the complaint drawn by that, attorney of record. The actual attorney of record was to receive one-fourth of the recovery. Settlement was made after substitution of a third attorney, who negotiated a division of the proceeds with judgment creditors, who obtained one-half of the settlement. All the recovery was subject to the rights which on substitution were preserved for the attorney of record by the terms of the order of substitution.

The- original attorney has forfeited his rights by concealment of the transaction from his client. If the action had been, carried through by the attorney of record, he would have been entitled to the full one-fourth. As a result of the substitution, however, he is entitled only to a reasonable compensation from the basis of his contract and of the services rendered and capable of being rendered by him. I-t [997]*997would seem that an allowance of $500 would be a fair compensation therefor, and such amount will be allowed from the entire proceeds of settlement. The plaintiff and judgment creditor may adjust their own shares therein, but the plaintiff will be held responsible for payment of the amount allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

The plaintiff retained an attorney to bring suit under an agreement for one-third of the proceeds. Action under this was brought by another attorney, through arrangement of which the plaintiff was not informed, but which she ratified by verifying the complaint drawn by that, attorney of record. The actual attorney of record was to receive one-fourth of the recovery. Settlement was made after substitution of a third attorney, who negotiated a division of the proceeds with judgment creditors, who obtained one-half of the settlement. All the recovery was subject to the rights which on substitution were preserved for the attorney of record by the terms of the order of substitution.

The- original attorney has forfeited his rights by concealment of the transaction from his client. If the action had been, carried through by the attorney of record, he would have been entitled to the full one-fourth. As a result of the substitution, however, he is entitled only to a reasonable compensation from the basis of his contract and of the services rendered and capable of being rendered by him. I-t [997]*997would seem that an allowance of $500 would be a fair compensation therefor, and such amount will be allowed from the entire proceeds of settlement. The plaintiff and judgment creditor may adjust their own shares therein, but the plaintiff will be held responsible for payment of the amount allowed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 F. 996, 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ibert-v-tna-life-ins-nyed-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack