Ibarra, Grecia M. v. Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc.,

2019 TN WC 183
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedDecember 19, 2019
Docket2019-01-0368
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 TN WC 183 (Ibarra, Grecia M. v. Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc.,) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ibarra, Grecia M. v. Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc.,, 2019 TN WC 183 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2019).

Opinion

FILED Dec 19, 2019

10:16 AM(ET) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT CHATTANOOGA

Grecia M. Ibarra, ) Docket No. 2019-01-0368 Employee, )

Vv. )

Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., ) State File No. 29413-2019 Employer, )

And )

American Zurich Insurance Company, ) Judge Audrey A. Headrick Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

The Court held an Expedited Hearing on December 9, 2019, to determine whether Ms. Ibarra is likely to establish at trial that she is entitled to a panel of orthopedists. Amazon disputed her entitlement to a panel, asserting that Ms. Ibarra failed to provide timely notice, did not sustain an identifiable injury, and did not prove causation.’ For the reasons below, the Court holds that Ms. Ibarra is entitled to a panel.

History of Claim

Ms. Ibarra allegedly injured her low back while repetitively lifting heavy boxes and totes on or about September 15, 2018, while working for Amazon. Ms. Ibarra stated she complained weekly to her supervisor about the back pain in September as it worsened. Some days, Ms. Ibarra cried at work or missed work due to the pain. After reporting her injury, Ms. Ibarra received ice packs and heat pads from Amcare, Amazon’s on-site medical clinic.” She did not receive a physician panel until April 23, 2019, after her supervisor’s manager learned of her injury.

' The parties stipulated that Amazon timely submitted additional defenses to the mediator to include with the Dispute Certification Notice.

* Ms. Ibarra continued working at Amazon performing the same job duties; however, once weekly Amazon permitted her to work light-duty from September through November.

l From the panel, Ms. Ibarra selected Dr. Natasha Ballard and saw her on April 29. She reported back pain for approximately six months from lifting heavy items at work, which worsened over time. Ms. Ibarra denied any history of back injury or family history of back problems. Dr. Ballard’s notes reflected “[uJnknown causation” and “[w]ill refer to ortho for further evaluation.” Approximately two weeks later, Ms. Ibarra received Amazon’s letter denying her claim. In June, Dr. Ballard responded to a letter from Ms. Ibarra’s counsel. When asked if she made the orthopedic referral to determine medical causation regarding Ms. Ibarra’s claimed work injury, Dr. Ballard checked “yes.”

After Amazon’s denial, Ms. Ibarra sought emergency treatment in July for acute low-back pain.’ The provider ordered a CT lumbar spine scan, which showed a mild broad-based disc bulge at L4-L5 and a mild central broad-based disc protrusion at L5-S1. The provider diagnosed a lumbar strain and prescribed pain medication and muscle relaxants. Other than some unsuccessful chiropractic treatment, Ms. Ibarra received no further treatment.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

To prevail at an expedited hearing, Ms. Ibarra must show a likelihood of prevailing at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2019). The Court holds she did.

Defenses

Amazon raised lack of timely notice as a defense to Ms. Ibarra’s claim. Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-201(a)(1) requires an employee to give written notice of a work injury “immediately upon the occurrence of an injury, or as soon thereafter as is reasonable and practicable” to an employer who has no actual notice. However, section 50-6-201(b)(1) requires an employee suffering from a gradual injury to provide notice within fifteen days after the employee: “(1) [k]nows or reasonably should know that the employee has suffered a work-related injury that has resulted in permanent physical impairment.”

Here, Ms. Ibarra’s unrebutted testimony is that she reported her gradual, work- related back pain to her supervisor in September. She credibly testified she continued reporting her ongoing back pain to her supervisor and received treatment at Amcare until she received a panel in April. The Court finds Amazon had actual notice of Ms. Ibarra’s injury in September 2018 when she reported her injury to her supervisor and when Amazon modified her work activities. Since Amazon had actual notice of Ms. Ibarra’s injury, its notice defense fails.

> Ms. Ibarra did not submit a complete copy of the provider’s records. Instead, she provided an After Visit Summary, which included the CT lumbar spine test results.

2 Next, Amazon raised lack of an identifiable injury as a defense to Ms. Ibarra’s claim. Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-102(13)(A)(1) defines an “accidental” injury as one “caused by a specific incident, or set of incidents, arising out of and in the course of employment, and is identifiable by time and place of occurrence.” However, section 50-6-102(13)(C) recognizes cumulative trauma or repetitive motion conditions as accidental injuries if “such conditions arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment.”

Amazon presented no proof contradicting Ms. Ibarra’s description of events occurring in September 2018. Instead, Ms. Ibarra’s unrebutted testimony is that she developed worsening back pain in September from repetitively lifting heavy boxes and totes. Therefore, the Court finds that she sustained a gradual injury at Amazon, identifiable by time and place. Thus, the Court holds Amazon’s lack of identifiable injury defense fails.

Causation

The remaining question to be resolved is whether Ms. Ibarra appears likely to prove her low-back condition arose primarily out of her employment at Amazon, which caused the need for medical treatment. A causation opinion by Dr. Ballard, as panel physician, is “presumed correct[.]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102 (14)(E). However, the Court finds that Dr. Ballard provided no opinion regarding causation. Thus, denying Ms. Ibarra’s claim on the basis of lack of causation at this juncture is premature. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *17-19 (Mar. 27, 2015).

Panel

Regarding her request for the orthopedic referral, Dr. Ballard, her panel physician, referred Ms. Ibarra to an orthopedist. When the treating physician refers the employee to a specialist physician, the employer must either accept a specified physician or provide a panel of specialists within three business days unless it accepts a direct referral. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)Gi). Since Dr. Ballard made no specific referral, Amazon must provide a panel of orthopedic specialists.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Amazon shall provide Ms. Ibarra an orthopedist panel for her back injury under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204.

2. This case is set for a Status Hearing on Wednesday, February 12, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The parties must call 423-634-0164 or toll-free at 855-383-

3 0001 to participate. Failure to call might result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of its entry under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3). Zurich must submit confirmation of compliance with this Order to the Bureau by email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business day after entry of this Order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-102
Tennessee § 50-6-102(14)(E)
§ 50-6-204
Tennessee § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 TN WC 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ibarra-grecia-m-v-amazon-fulfillment-services-inc-tennworkcompcl-2019.