iBall Instruments LLC v. Butler

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA iBALL INSTRUMENTS, LLC, ) an Oklahoma limited liability company, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-21-00778-JD ) MYRON BUTLER; MARK ROBERT ) DAVIS; DAVID E. MOORE; TOC ) SOLUTIONS, INC., an Oklahoma ) corporation; TELECOMM ) CONSULTANTS, INC., an Oklahoma ) corporation; TOC RURAL ) SOLUTIONS, LLC, an Oklahoma ) limited liability company, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER On September 13, 2021, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint. [Doc. No. 16]. Plaintiff thereafter filed an Amended Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B). [Doc. No. 20]. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint “supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect.” Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991); see Predator Int’l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc., 793 F.3d 1177, 1180–81 (10th Cir. 2015); Mink v. Suthers, 482 F.3d 1244, 1254 (10th Cir. 2007). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 16] is DENIED AS MOOT and without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of October 2021.

W. DISHMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE