Iannucci v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Iannucci v. State

509 So. 2d 381, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1629, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9156

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 1, 1987

DocketNo. 86-1146

StatusPublished

This text of 509 So. 2d 381 (Iannucci v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Iannucci v. State, 509 So. 2d 381, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1629, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9156 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant raises two points in this appeal. We reject the point relating to the validity of the plea herein. However, we find merit in the appellant’s claim of lack of notice as to assessment of costs. See Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

Therefore, the judgment and sentence are affirmed, but the award of costs is stricken. Should the state wish to tax costs it may proceed on remand in accordance with Jenkins.

DANAHY, C.J., and RYDER and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant raises two points in this appeal. We reject the point relating to the validity of the plea herein. However, we find merit in the appellant’s claim of lack of notice as to assessment of costs. See Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

Therefore, the judgment and sentence are affirmed, but the award of costs is stricken. Should the state wish to tax costs it may proceed on remand in accordance with Jenkins.

DANAHY, C.J., and RYDER and HALL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

509 So. 2d 381, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1629, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iannucci-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack