Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corp.

512 F. App'x 365

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 28, 2013

DocketNo. 12-2332

StatusPublished

This text of 512 F. App'x 365 (Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corp., 512 F. App'x 365 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marge Iannucci appeals the district court’s order entering judgment in her employment discrimination action in accordance with the Defendant’s Fed. R.Civ.P. 68 offer and dismissing the remainder of the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. She also appeals the order compelling discovery and entering a confidentiality order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 1:11-cv-00281-MRDLH (W.D.N.C. July 24 & Oct. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marge Iannucci appeals the district court’s order entering judgment in her employment discrimination action in accordance with the Defendant’s Fed. R.Civ.P. 68 offer and dismissing the remainder of the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. She also appeals the order compelling discovery and entering a confidentiality order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 1:11-cv-00281-MRDLH (W.D.N.C. July 24 & Oct. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

512 F. App'x 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iannucci-v-rite-aid-corp-ca4-2013.