Ian Kenton v. State
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00903-CR
Ian KENTON, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011CR7419 Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 7, 2012
DISMISSED
Ian Lamar Kenton entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to which
he pleaded nolo contendere to Deadly Conduct-Firearm. The clerk’s record establishes the
punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the
prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record also
appears to support the trial court’s certification that Ian Lamar Kenton does not have a right to 04-11-00903-CR
appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of
appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate).
On January 3, 2012, we gave Appellant notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless
an amended trial court certification showing he has the right to appeal has been made part of the
appellate record by February 2, 2012. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110
S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003
WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). An amended
certification showing Appellant has the right to appeal has not been filed. We therefore dismiss
this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ian Kenton v. State (Ian Kenton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.