Iacobucci v. Hollywood Tile & Terrazzo Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Iacobucci v. Hollywood Tile & Terrazzo Co.

193 So. 2d 169

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 23, 1966

DocketNo. 35294

StatusPublished

This text of 193 So. 2d 169 (Iacobucci v. Hollywood Tile & Terrazzo Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Iacobucci v. Hollywood Tile & Terrazzo Co., 193 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 23, 1966.

We find upon argument of counsel for the respective parties, consideration of the briefs and the record in this cause that the essential requirements of law have not been violated. It is therefore ordered that said petition be and the same is hereby denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., and PARKER, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 23, 1966.

We find upon argument of counsel for the respective parties, consideration of the briefs and the record in this cause that the essential requirements of law have not been violated. It is therefore ordered that said petition be and the same is hereby denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., and PARKER, Circuit Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 So. 2d 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iacobucci-v-hollywood-tile-terrazzo-co-fla-1966.