Iacangelo v. Georgetown University

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Iacangelo v. Georgetown University. Read the opinion of the Court — 580 F. Supp. 2d 111
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided November 19, 2010·No. Civil Action No. 2005-2086·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________ ) FELICE I. IACANGELO, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-2086 (PLF) ) GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________)

ORDER

For the reasons provided in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that [115] plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of Magistrate Judge

Kay’s June 17, 2008 order is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that [143] defendants’ motion for partial summary

judgment as to Counts II, III and IV of plaintiffs’ second amended complaint is GRANTED in

part and DENIED in part; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that JUDGMENT for the defendants be entered as to

Counts III (breach of warranty) and IV (fraud) of the second amended complaint.

SO ORDERED.

/s/_______________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: November 19, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Iacangelo v. Georgetown University, (D.D.C. 2010).

Iacangelo v. Georgetown University (Iacangelo v. Georgetown University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.