Iacangelo v. Georgetown University
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
____________________________________ ) FELICE I. IACANGELO, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-2086 (PLF) ) GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________)
ORDER
For the reasons provided in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby
ORDERED that [115] plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of Magistrate Judge
Kay’s June 17, 2008 order is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that [143] defendants’ motion for partial summary
judgment as to Counts II, III and IV of plaintiffs’ second amended complaint is GRANTED in
part and DENIED in part; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that JUDGMENT for the defendants be entered as to
Counts III (breach of warranty) and IV (fraud) of the second amended complaint.
SO ORDERED.
/s/_______________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: November 19, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Iacangelo v. Georgetown University (Iacangelo v. Georgetown University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.