I. Tanenbaum Son & Co. v. Oxford Dye Works, Inc.
153 A. 501, 107 N.J.L. 386, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 178
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court, Passaic Circuit, is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Porter in the foregoing opinion.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Tredchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloxd, Case, Bodide, Daly, Dodges, Yad Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
I. Tanenbaum Son & Co. v. Oxford Dye Works, Inc., 153 A. 501, 107 N.J.L. 386, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 178 (N.J. 1931).
153 A. 501 (I. Tanenbaum Son & Co. v. Oxford Dye Works, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ocean Salvors Co. v. Crossway Navigation Agency, Inc.
543 F. Supp. 918 (S.D. New York, 1982)
Trust Co. of Glen Rock v. Shrewsbury Furniture & Mfg. Co.
158 A. 641 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)