I. Tanenbaum Son & Co. v. Oxford Dye Works, Inc.
153 A. 501, 107 N.J.L. 386, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 178
This text of 153 A. 501 (I. Tanenbaum Son & Co. v. Oxford Dye Works, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
I. Tanenbaum Son & Co. v. Oxford Dye Works, Inc., 153 A. 501, 107 N.J.L. 386, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 178 (N.J. 1931).
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court, Passaic Circuit, is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Porter in the foregoing opinion.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Tredchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloxd, Case, Bodide, Daly, Dodges, Yad Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ocean Salvors Co. v. Crossway Navigation Agency, Inc.
543 F. Supp. 918 (S.D. New York, 1982)
Trust Co. of Glen Rock v. Shrewsbury Furniture & Mfg. Co.
158 A. 641 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
153 A. 501, 107 N.J.L. 386, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/i-tanenbaum-son-co-v-oxford-dye-works-inc-nj-1931.