I. P. & C. R. Co. v. Bowers

Indiana Supreme Court

I. P. & C. R. Co. v. Bowers

34 Ind. 480

DecidedNovember 15, 1870

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Ind. 480 (I. P. & C. R. Co. v. Bowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

I. P. & C. R. Co. v. Bowers, 34 Ind. 480 (Ind. 1870).

Pincite

Opinion

Pettit, C. J.

Rule eighteenth of this court is as follows: “ The assignment of errors shall contain the full names of the parties; and process, when necessary, shall issue accordingly.” In the assignment of errors in this case, the names of the parties set out are, “ The I. P. & C. R. Company, appellant, v. John Bowers, appellee.” This is not a compliance with the rule above cited, and for that reason must be dismissed. Brookover v. Forst, 31 Ind. 255; and The State, ex rel. Childrs, v. Delano (ante, p. 52), decided at this term, and authorities there cited.

The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pettit, C. J.

Rule eighteenth of this court is as follows: “ The assignment of errors shall contain the full names of the parties; and process, when necessary, shall issue accordingly.” In the assignment of errors in this case, the names of the parties set out are, “ The I. P. & C. R. Company, appellant, v. John Bowers, appellee.” This is not a compliance with the rule above cited, and for that reason must be dismissed. Brookover v. Forst, 31 Ind. 255; and The State, ex rel. Childrs, v. Delano (ante, p. 52), decided at this term, and authorities there cited.

The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Ind. 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/i-p-c-r-co-v-bowers-ind-1870.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack