I. & G. N. R. R. v. Grant

1 White & W. 430
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 26, 1881
DocketNo. 1091, Op. Book No. 2, p. 354
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 430 (I. & G. N. R. R. v. Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
I. & G. N. R. R. v. Grant, 1 White & W. 430 (Tex. Ct. App. 1881).

Opinion

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 783. Appeal bond; need not be signed by appellant. The statute does not require that the appellant shall sign the appeal bond. The execution of the bond by the sure[431]*431ties is sufficient, the principal being as effectually bound by the judgment without signing the bond as he could have been by it. [Shelton v. Wade, 4 Tex. 148; Lindsay v. Price, 33 Tex. 280.]

February 26, 1881.

§ 78 4. Jurisdiction; counterclaim. Where the counterclaim pleaded by the defendant in a suit before a justice of the peace Avas for more than $100, it was held on appeal that the counterclaim was the amount in controversy, and conferred jurisdiction. The appeal from the justice’s to the county court Avas improperly dismissed.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Randon v. Barton
4 Tex. 145 (Texas Supreme Court, 1849)
Lindsay v. Price
33 Tex. 280 (Texas Supreme Court, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/i-g-n-r-r-v-grant-texapp-1881.