I. Freeman & Son, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

I. Freeman & Son, Inc. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 519

United States Customs Court·Decided June 23, 1960·No. No. 64344; protests 147948-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

[520]*520Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “C” consist of candlesticks similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62036, the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 397, as modified by T.D. 51802, was sustained. The items marked “A,” stipulated to be the same as the candlesticks involved in said Abstract 62036, except that they are not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, nor colored with gold lacquer, were held dutiable at 22% percent under paragraph 397, as modified by T.D. 51802.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[520]*520Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “C” consist of candlesticks similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62036, the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 397, as modified by T.D. 51802, was sustained. The items marked “A,” stipulated to be the same as the candlesticks involved in said Abstract 62036, except that they are not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, nor colored with gold lacquer, were held dutiable at 22% percent under paragraph 397, as modified by T.D. 51802.

I. Freeman & Son, Inc. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 519 (cusc 1960).

Pincite

44 Cust. Ct. 519 (I. Freeman & Son, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.