I. Freeman & Son, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

I. Freeman & Son, Inc. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 361

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 20, 1955

DocketNo. 59611; protests 160626-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Cust. Ct. 361 (I. Freeman & Son, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

I. Freeman & Son, Inc. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 361 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silent butlers and smoothing irons, the composition of which is the same in all material respects as the merchandise involved in The Fan Co. v. United States (25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261) and Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silent butlers and smoothing irons, the composition of which is the same in all material respects as the merchandise involved in The Fan Co. v. United States (25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261) and Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Cust. Ct. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/i-freeman-son-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack