I Concurred With The Majority In Arnold Carter v. State, No. 03C01-9509-Cc

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

I Concurred With The Majority In Arnold Carter v. State, No. 03C01-9509-Cc

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

DecidedFebruary 12, 1997

Docket01C01-9511-CC-00398

StatusPublished

This text of I Concurred With The Majority In Arnold Carter v. State, No. 03C01-9509-Cc (I Concurred With The Majority In Arnold Carter v. State, No. 03C01-9509-Cc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

I Concurred With The Majority In Arnold Carter v. State, No. 03C01-9509-Cc, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE FILED DECEMBER 1996 SESSION February 12, 1997

Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk DOYLE CARTER, ) No. 01C01-9511-CC-00398 ) Appellant ) ) DAVIDSON COUNTY V. ) ) HON. WALTER C. KURTZ, STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) JUDGE ) Appellee. ) (Post-Conviction) ) )

CONCURRING OPINION

I concurred with the majority in Arnold Carter v. State, No. 03C01-9509-CC-

00270 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Knoxville, July 11, 1996), holding that the petition was filed

within the statute of limitations. Upon further reflection, I am of the opinion that the

dissenting opinion by Judge David Welles in that case is the correct view of the statute

when this Court is confronted with a petition such as the one in appellant’s case.

Therefore, I concur with the majority opinion in this case for the reasons stated here

and for those I expressed in Stephen Koprowski v. State, No. 03C01-9511-CC-00365

(Tenn. Crim. App. at Knoxville, January 28, 1997).

_______________________________ William M. Barker, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI