I. Berlin & Son, Inc. v. New York City Omnibus Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

I. Berlin & Son, Inc. v. New York City Omnibus Corp.

171 Misc. 674, 14 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2284

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 24, 1939

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 171 Misc. 674 (I. Berlin & Son, Inc. v. New York City Omnibus Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

I. Berlin & Son, Inc. v. New York City Omnibus Corp., 171 Misc. 674, 14 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2284 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As the insufficiency of the defense of another action pending appears upon the face of the answer, the use of the affidavit in aid of same was improper. (Welch v. City of Niagara Falls, 210 App. Div. 170; Reddington v. Elco Merchandising Corp., Inc., 236 App. Div. 64.) That both actions involved the same accident and common questions, may be a ground for consolidation, at least for purposes of trial, but the prior action is not another action pending between the same parties for the same cause. (Tyler v. Standard Wine Co., 52 Misc. 374; affd., 121 App. Div. 928; Tarbell v. Howard, 162 Misc. 606.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted.

All concur. Present — Hammer, Shientao and Noonan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

As the insufficiency of the defense of another action pending appears upon the face of the answer, the use of the affidavit in aid of same was improper. (Welch v. City of Niagara Falls, 210 App. Div. 170; Reddington v. Elco Merchandising Corp., Inc., 236 App. Div. 64.) That both actions involved the same accident and common questions, may be a ground for consolidation, at least for purposes of trial, but the prior action is not another action pending between the same parties for the same cause. (Tyler v. Standard Wine Co., 52 Misc. 374; affd., 121 App. Div. 928; Tarbell v. Howard, 162 Misc. 606.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted.

All concur. Present — Hammer, Shientao and Noonan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 Misc. 674, 14 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/i-berlin-son-inc-v-new-york-city-omnibus-corp-nyappterm-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack