I. B. Cohen & Sons Corp. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1038, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1865
United States Customs Court·Decided April 30, 1968·No. No. P68/228; protests 60/1399, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist [1039]*1039of battery-operated horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of S. Hiller & Co. et al. v. United States (59 Cust. Ct. 79, C.D. 3082), and iblnat the items of merchandise marked “C” covered by the foregoing protests consist of rubber bulb horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of Sherwin International, Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

I. B. Cohen & Sons Corp. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1038, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1865 (cusc 1968).

60 Cust. Ct. 1038 (I. B. Cohen & Sons Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sherwin International, Inc. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 466 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)
S. Hiller & Co. v. United States
59 Cust. Ct. 79 (U.S. Customs Court, 1967)