I-10 Colony, Inc. v. Chao Kuan Lee, Li Yang Lee, Li Hsiang Chang

Court of Appeals of Texas

I-10 Colony, Inc. v. Chao Kuan Lee, Li Yang Lee, Li Hsiang Chang

DecidedDecember 28, 2012

Docket14-10-01051-CV

StatusPublished

This text of I-10 Colony, Inc. v. Chao Kuan Lee, Li Yang Lee, Li Hsiang Chang (I-10 Colony, Inc. v. Chao Kuan Lee, Li Yang Lee, Li Hsiang Chang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

I-10 Colony, Inc. v. Chao Kuan Lee, Li Yang Lee, Li Hsiang Chang, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

September 25, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals I-10 COLONY, INC., Appellant

NO. 14-10-01051-CV V.

CHAO KUAN LEE, LI YANG LEE, LI HSIANG CHANG, Appellees ________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, Chao Kuan Lee, Li Yang Lee, Li Hsiang Chang, signed September 22, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find that the trial court erred in determining the beginning date for the calculation of prejudgment interest. We therefore REFORM the judgment to change the beginning date for the calculation of prejudgment interest to March 5, 2010. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED as so modified.

We order appellant, I-10 Colony, Inc., to pay all costs in this appeal. We further order the decision certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

September 25, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals I-10 COLONY, INC., Appellant

NO. 14-10-01051-CV V.

CHAO KUAN LEE, LI YANG LEE, LI HSIANG CHANG, Appellees ________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, Chao Kuan Lee, Li Yang Lee, Li Hsiang Chang, signed September 22, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find that the trial court erred in determining the beginning date for the calculation of prejudgment interest. We therefore REFORM the judgment to change the beginning date for the calculation of prejudgment interest to March 5, 2010. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED as so modified.

We order appellant, I-10 Colony, Inc., to pay all costs in this appeal. We further order the decision certified below for observance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

I-10 Colony, Inc. v. Chao Kuan Lee, Li Yang Lee, Li Hsiang Chang, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/i-10-colony-inc-v-chao-kuan-lee-li-yang-lee-li-hsi-texapp-2012.