Hyslop v. Wojjusik
617 N.W.2d 326, 463 Mich. 889
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 10, 2000
Docket116390, COA No. 222858
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 617 N.W.2d 326 (Hyslop v. Wojjusik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hyslop v. Wojjusik, 617 N.W.2d 326, 463 Mich. 889 (Mich. 2000).
Opinion
Otto HYSLOP, Sr. and Helen Hyslop, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Jennie Denise WOJJUSIK, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the February 2, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hyslop v. Wojjusik
652 N.W.2d 517 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2002)
Murphy v. Secretary of State
617 N.W.2d 325 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2000)
People v. Pittman
617 N.W.2d 326 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
617 N.W.2d 326, 463 Mich. 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyslop-v-wojjusik-mich-2000.