Hyslop v. Mobil Oil Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hyslop v. Mobil Oil Corp.

302 A.D.2d 1017, 753 N.Y.S.2d 416

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion and cross motion for renewal granted and, upon renewal, ordering paragraph and memorandum of memorandum and order entered July 3, 2002 (296 AD2d 827) are amended by providing that the order appealed from is modified on the law by granting those parts of defendants’ motions seeking summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action and dismissing that cause of action (see Nagel v D & R Realty Corp., 99 NY2d 98) and as modified the order is affirmed with costs to plaintiff. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Gorski, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion and cross motion for renewal granted and, upon renewal, ordering paragraph and memorandum of memorandum and order entered July 3, 2002 (296 AD2d 827) are amended by providing that the order appealed from is modified on the law by granting those parts of defendants’ motions seeking summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action and dismissing that cause of action (see Nagel v D & R Realty Corp., 99 NY2d 98) and as modified the order is affirmed with costs to plaintiff. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Gorski, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.

Hyslop v. Mobil Oil Corp., 302 A.D.2d 1017, 753 N.Y.S.2d 416 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

302 A.D.2d 1017 (Hyslop v. Mobil Oil Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related