Hyslop v. Mobil Oil Corp.

302 A.D.2d 1017, 753 N.Y.S.2d 416
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 7, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 302 A.D.2d 1017 (Hyslop v. Mobil Oil Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hyslop v. Mobil Oil Corp., 302 A.D.2d 1017, 753 N.Y.S.2d 416 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

Motion and cross motion for renewal granted and, upon renewal, ordering paragraph and memorandum of memorandum and order entered July 3, 2002 (296 AD2d 827) are amended by providing that the order appealed from is modified on the law by granting those parts of defendants’ motions seeking summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action and dismissing that cause of action (see Nagel v D & R Realty Corp., 99 NY2d 98) and as modified the order is affirmed with costs to plaintiff. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Gorski, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buckmann v. State
64 A.D.3d 1137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 A.D.2d 1017, 753 N.Y.S.2d 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyslop-v-mobil-oil-corp-nyappdiv-2003.