Hyslop v. Lasusa
This text of 21 A.D.3d 990 (Hyslop v. Lasusa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Mahopac Central School District and Catherine White appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Shapiro, J), dated October 8, 2004, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
There are questions of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Adams, J.P., Crane, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 A.D.3d 990, 800 N.Y.S.2d 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyslop-v-lasusa-nyappdiv-2005.