Hyppolite v. Taco Bell Corp.

Eleventh Circuit

Hyppolite v. Taco Bell Corp.

135 F. App'x 206

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 27, 2005·No. No. 04-11193; D.C. Docket No. 02-61610-CV-WPD·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a six-day trial, the jury rendered a verdict for defendant Taco Bell on plaintiffs claims for sexual harassment, retaliation and failure to pay overtime. The plaintiff appeals, arguing that the district court erred in its instructions to the jury and in granting defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on one claim. After full consideration of the briefs, oral argument and the record before us, we find no reversible error in the trial or in [207]*207the judgment based on the jury’s findings and answers to the special interrogatories.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After a six-day trial, the jury rendered a verdict for defendant Taco Bell on plaintiffs claims for sexual harassment, retaliation and failure to pay overtime. The plaintiff appeals, arguing that the district court erred in its instructions to the jury and in granting defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on one claim. After full consideration of the briefs, oral argument and the record before us, we find no reversible error in the trial or in [207]*207the judgment based on the jury’s findings and answers to the special interrogatories.

AFFIRMED.

Hyppolite v. Taco Bell Corp., 135 F. App'x 206 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

135 F. App'x 206 (Hyppolite v. Taco Bell Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.