Hyppolite v. Taco Bell Corp.
This text of 135 F. App'x 206 (Hyppolite v. Taco Bell Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After a six-day trial, the jury rendered a verdict for defendant Taco Bell on plaintiffs claims for sexual harassment, retaliation and failure to pay overtime. The plaintiff appeals, arguing that the district court erred in its instructions to the jury and in granting defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on one claim. After full consideration of the briefs, oral argument and the record before us, we find no reversible error in the trial or in [207]*207the judgment based on the jury’s findings and answers to the special interrogatories.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 F. App'x 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyppolite-v-taco-bell-corp-ca11-2005.