Hynes v. Tomei
527 U.S. 1015, 119 S. Ct. 2359, 144 L. Ed. 2d 254, 67 U.S.L.W. 3757, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 4184
Opinion
Ct. App. N. Y. Motions of respondents Angel Mateo and Michael Hale for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hynes v. Tomei, 527 U.S. 1015, 119 S. Ct. 2359, 144 L. Ed. 2d 254, 67 U.S.L.W. 3757, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 4184 (1999).
527 U.S. 1015 (Hynes v. Tomei) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parker v. Phillips
717 F. Supp. 2d 310 (W.D. New York, 2010)
Luffey v. FREDERICKSBURG PROPERTIES OF TX
862 So. 2d 403 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2003)
Kandies v. Lee
252 F. Supp. 2d 252 (M.D. North Carolina, 2003)
David Gary v. Dave Dormire
Eighth Circuit, 2001
Jeffrey Washington v. Sunny Schriver, Superintendent, Wallkill Correctional Facility
240 F.3d 101 (Second Circuit, 2001)
Salcedo v. Artuz
107 F. Supp. 2d 405 (S.D. New York, 2000)
Harold Wayne Nichols v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, 2000
Frye v. Lee
89 F. Supp. 2d 693 (W.D. North Carolina, 2000)