Hymel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

607 So. 2d 544, 1992 La. LEXIS 3533, 1992 WL 347589
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 13, 1992
DocketNo. 92-CC-2943
StatusPublished

This text of 607 So. 2d 544 (Hymel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hymel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 607 So. 2d 544, 1992 La. LEXIS 3533, 1992 WL 347589 (La. 1992).

Opinion

In re Hymel, William K.; Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Nos. 369-233; 360-413, Fifth Circuit, Court of Appeal, No. 92-CW-0909.

Granted. Order of trial court and court of appeal reversed. Trial court is ordered to allow plaintiffs witnesses, Joe Watson, Dr. Cornelius Gorman, Lynn Giardino, and Dr. Steve Taylor, to testify.

LEMMON, J., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
607 So. 2d 544, 1992 La. LEXIS 3533, 1992 WL 347589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hymel-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-la-1992.