Hymas v. United States

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 13-291 C Filed: April 8, 2016

************************************* * JAY HYMAS, * d/b/a DOSMEN FARMS, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * *************************************

ORDER

Pursuant to the April 6, 2016 mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the permanent injunction is dissolved, this case is transferred to the United States Court District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, as requested by Plaintiffs’ April 7, 2016 Motion to Transfer, ECF No. 54, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631, a “disposition consistent with the [mandate].” See Hymas v. United States, 810 F.3d 1312, 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2016); see also id. at 1330 n.10 (“Because the Claims Court does not possess jurisdiction . . . we need not address its findings that the Service violated various federal procurement laws and the APA [Administrative Procedures Act.]”).

Accordingly, this case is dismissed and the Government’s April 7, 2016 Motion For Reconsideration (ECF No. 56) is denied and moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Susan G. Braden SUSAN G. BRADEN Judge