Hyman v. Veith
This text of 77 So. 854 (Hyman v. Veith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.
The motion is based on the allegation that the appeal bond was filed more than 12 months after the judgment appealed from was signed.
Judgment was rendered October 19, 1916, and signed October 25, 1916. A petition for a devolutive appeal was filed October 25, 1917, and an order of appeal was granted on condition that the petitioner should furnish bond in the sum of $100. The bond was not furnished and filed until November 28, 1917, more than one year after the judgment was rendered. C. P. art. 593. The bond was filed too late.
The appeal was not completed until the bond was filed; and the appeal had to be taken within one year after the judgment was rendered. Wood v. Calloway, 21 La. Ann. 481; Boutte v. Boutte, 30 La. Ann. 177; Immanuel Church v. Riedy, 104 La. 318, 29 South. 149; People’s Bank v. Arceneaux, 134 La. 292, 64 South. 116.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 So. 854, 142 La. 933, 1918 La. LEXIS 1463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyman-v-veith-la-1918.