Hyman v. Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hyman v. Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital

24 A.D.2d 864, 264 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3090

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 1, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 864 (Hyman v. Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hyman v. Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital, 24 A.D.2d 864, 264 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3090 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding by a director of the Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital (a membership corporation), pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR, to permit him to inspect minutes of the meetings of the hospital’s board of directors, certain hospital records relating to its administration, and certain patients’ charts and records, etc., the hospital appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered July 6, 1965, as requires it to disclose to petitioner the names of the particular patients involved and as refuses to appoint a Referee to supervise the inspection subject to a direction that such names need not be disclosed. Order, insofar [865]*865as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the directions as to nondisclosure contained in the sixth decretal paragraph of the order appear to furnish sufficient and satisfactory safeguards and protection, especially in light of the fact that petitioner is an attorney at law and as such an officer of this court. (For prior related appeals, see Matter of Hyman v. Jewish Chronic Disease Hosp., 21 A D 2d 495, revd. 15 N Y 2d 317.) Motion by appellant for a stay denied. Christ, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding by a director of the Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital (a membership corporation), pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR, to permit him to inspect minutes of the meetings of the hospital’s board of directors, certain hospital records relating to its administration, and certain patients’ charts and records, etc., the hospital appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered July 6, 1965, as requires it to disclose to petitioner the names of the particular patients involved and as refuses to appoint a Referee to supervise the inspection subject to a direction that such names need not be disclosed. Order, insofar [865]*865as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the directions as to nondisclosure contained in the sixth decretal paragraph of the order appear to furnish sufficient and satisfactory safeguards and protection, especially in light of the fact that petitioner is an attorney at law and as such an officer of this court. (For prior related appeals, see Matter of Hyman v. Jewish Chronic Disease Hosp., 21 A D 2d 495, revd. 15 N Y 2d 317.) Motion by appellant for a stay denied. Christ, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 864, 264 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyman-v-jewish-chronic-disease-hospital-nyappdiv-1965.