Hyman v. Hillelson

430 N.E.2d 1304, 55 N.Y.2d 624, 446 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3217
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 17, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 430 N.E.2d 1304 (Hyman v. Hillelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hyman v. Hillelson, 430 N.E.2d 1304, 55 N.Y.2d 624, 446 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3217 (N.Y. 1981).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The factual context in which this case arises is set forth in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (79 AD2d 725). When in 1974 plaintiffs unsuccessfully brought an action against the present defendants (and others) asserting claims to ownership of the property in Fulton County, they then predicated their right to recovery on the equitable remedy of contract reformation. When they thereafter instituted the present action in 1979 asserting a right to a substantial portion of the same property they grounded their claim on the theory of adverse possession, expressly recited to have commenced in and continued since 1955. As the Appellate Division correctly noted, this theory of recovery with respect to this property against these defendants was available to plaintiffs when they brought their 1974 action. Accordingly, it is now barred under recognized principles of claim preclusion (Matter of Reilly v Reid, 45 NY2d 24; Restatement, Judgments 2d [Tent Draft No. 5, 1978], §§ 61, 61.1).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pereira v. Brown
S.D. New York, 2022
In re Chaitan
517 B.R. 419 (E.D. New York, 2014)
Comrie, Inc. v. Lake Avenue, Inc.
86 A.D.3d 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
City of New York v. Schmitt
50 A.D.3d 1032 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
McKesson Automated Healthcare, Inc. v. Brooklyn Hosp. Ctr.
2004 NY Slip Op 24205 (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2004)
McKesson Automated Healthcare, Inc. v. Brooklyn Hospital Center
4 Misc. 3d 491 (New York Supreme Court, 2004)
Breeden v. Tricom Business Systems, Inc.
244 F. Supp. 2d 5 (N.D. New York, 2003)
Grammas v. Chamberlain
274 A.D.2d 500 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Am. Estate Mgt. v. Intern. Inv. & Dev.
1999 UT App 232 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1999)
Finkelstein v. Ilan
239 A.D.2d 545 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Klein v. Barrios-Paoli
237 A.D.2d 165 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Coliseum Towers Associates v. County of Nassau
217 A.D.2d 387 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Bliss v. Jaffin
176 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
County of Nassau v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board
151 A.D.2d 168 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Oppenheim v. Pemberton
154 A.D.2d 843 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Public Service Truck Renting, Inc. v. Ambassador Insurance
136 A.D.2d 911 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
In re Schunk
136 A.D.2d 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
McFerran v. Board of Education
130 A.D.2d 886 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Partlow v. Kolupa
122 A.D.2d 509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
430 N.E.2d 1304, 55 N.Y.2d 624, 446 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyman-v-hillelson-ny-1981.