Hyman v. Erie Concrete & Steel Supply Co.
This text of 46 A.2d 586 (Hyman v. Erie Concrete & Steel Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff brought an action in assumpsit against defendant and ashed for an accounting under section 11 *45 of the Practice Act of 1915, as amended, 12 PS §393. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. The court below dismissed defendant’s motions for a new trial and judgment n. o. v. and directed that judgment be entered on the verdict, upon payment of the jury fee. Defendant has appealed.
It is well settled that a judgment for an accounting is interlocutory and not appealable: Miller v. Belmont P. & Rubber Co., 268 Pa. 51, 66, 110 A. 802; Hall v. Haines, 38 Pa. Superior Ct. 517.
The appeal is quashed at the costs of appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 A.2d 586, 159 Pa. Super. 44, 1946 Pa. Super. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyman-v-erie-concrete-steel-supply-co-pasuperct-1946.