Hyman J. Silverman v. Constitution Life Insurance Company, Successor to Sterling Insurance Company

Third Circuit

Hyman J. Silverman v. Constitution Life Insurance Company, Successor to Sterling Insurance Company

345 F.2d 177

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJuly 6, 1965

Docket14972

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 345 F.2d 177 (Hyman J. Silverman v. Constitution Life Insurance Company, Successor to Sterling Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hyman J. Silverman v. Constitution Life Insurance Company, Successor to Sterling Insurance Company, 345 F.2d 177 (3d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This much contested litigation, now being pursued by appellant without counsel, is here for the third time. On the appeal immediately preceding this one we affirmed the district court’s denial of post-judgment relief under Rule 60(b). In so doing we said:

“While we recognize his sincerity and determination, we think he has had full opportunity to present his various contentions. There must be an end to litigation even though a litigant continues to be dissatisfied with the outcome.” 3 Cir., 314 F.2d 944.

Nevertheless, appellant has persisted in numerous additional filings in this case in the district court. Ultimately, that court issued an order enjoining appellant from further litigation of the matter in suit. This appeal has been taken from that order.

The district court acted in permissible exercise of discretion consistent with the above quoted language of this court.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI