Hylton v. Hylton

1 Va. 161, 1 Gratt. 161
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedSeptember 15, 1844
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 1 Va. 161 (Hylton v. Hylton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hylton v. Hylton, 1 Va. 161, 1 Gratt. 161 (Va. 1844).

Opinion

Allen, J.

delivered the opinion of the court.

The court is of opinion, that if the execution of the paper purporting to be the last will and testament of George Hylton senior, deceased, dated the 13th day of June 1835, had been duly proved, according to the requisitions of the act of assembly prescribing the mode of executing wills, the evidence adduced to shew a cancellation or revocation thereof, was not sufficient to establish such cancellation or revocation.

[165]*165The court is further of opinion, that the admission of , , , i the contestants that the paper had been duly executed as the last will and testament of the deceased, did not dispense with the production of the testimony required by law to prove the execution thereof. But as the oxhibition of such proof was prevented by the admissions of the contestants that the same was duly executed and attested, and that the testator was at the time thereof of sound mind and disposing memory; and that they opposed the admission of said paper to probat, upon the ground that it was subsequently cancelled or revoked; an opportunity should be afforded to the propounders of said paper, to exhibit further proof of its execution.

The court is therefore of opinion, that the judgment of the circuit superior court affirming the sentence and order of the county court, refusing to admit said paper to probat, is erroneous. The same is therefore reversed, with costs; and the cause is remanded to said circuit superior court, with instructions to receive further proof of the execution of the paper; and for further proceedings thereon according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guaranty Title & Trust Corp. v. United States
264 U.S. 200 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Cook v. Raleigh Lumber Co.
82 S.E. 327 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1914)
Green v. Pennington
54 S.E. 877 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1906)
McMurray v. Dixon
54 S.E. 481 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1906)
Estate of Johnson
2 Coffey 425 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1903)
Stull v. Rich Patch Iron Co.
23 S.E. 293 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1895)
Clark v. Perdue
21 S.E. 735 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1895)
Lennig's Ex'rs v. White
20 S.E. 831 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1894)
Mullan's Adm'r v. Carper
16 S.E. 527 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1892)
Swann v. Young
14 S.E. 426 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1892)
Taylor v. Philippi
14 S.E. 130 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1891)
Ketchum v. Spurlock
12 S.E. 832 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1891)
Oney v. Clendenin
28 W. Va. 34 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1886)
Witten v. St. Clair
27 W. Va. 762 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1886)
Hall v. Hall
27 W. Va. 468 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1886)
Gilmore v. Tuttle
40 N.J. Eq. 385 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1885)
Garrett v. Ramsey
26 W. Va. 345 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1885)
Core v. Faupel
24 W. Va. 238 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1884)
Allen v. Jeter
74 Tenn. 672 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1881)
Turpin v. Saunders
73 Va. 27 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Va. 161, 1 Gratt. 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hylton-v-hylton-va-1844.