Hyland v. Calace

244 A.D.2d 318, 663 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11029
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 3, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 244 A.D.2d 318 (Hyland v. Calace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hyland v. Calace, 244 A.D.2d 318, 663 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11029 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Schmidt, J.), dated December 13, 1996, which granted the defendant third-party plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In the early morning of April 28, 1990, the plaintiffs’ decedent drove off the southbound lanes of the Wantagh Parkway and struck the respondent’s parked trailer. An autopsy revealed that the decedent had a .15% alcohol level. There were no skid marks on the roadway. As a result of the accident, the decedent’s car was separated, leaving the rear half of the vehicle across the parkway from the front half.

The plaintiffs contend that the respondent’s trailer was illegally stopped on the roadway’s right-hand shoulder without an adequate number of barricades warning of its presence. However, assuming arguendo that the respondent’s trailer was illegally stopped, and that there were an insufficient number of [319]*319barricades to warn of its presence, the record discloses that it was the manner in which the decedent’s automobile was being operated at the time and not the placement of the trailer which, as a matter of law, was the sole proximate cause of the accident and the decedent’s consequent death (see, Lectora v Gundrum, 225 AD2d 738, 739; Barile v Lazzarini, 222 AD2d 635; Metzler v Brawley, 209 AD2d 487; DiMarco v Verone, 147 AD2d 671, 672). O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fuzailova v. Rincon
2022 NY Slip Op 07060 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Gall v. Schwed
119 A.D.3d 524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Papadakis v. HM Kelly, Inc.
97 A.D.3d 731 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Iqbal v. Thai
83 A.D.3d 897 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Dauber v. Ken Lamont Stone
76 A.D.2d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Turnmire v. Concrete Applied Technologies Corp.
56 A.D.2d 1125 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Firmes v. Chase Manhattan Automotive Finance Corp.
50 A.D.3d 18 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
LaSpina v. City of New York
22 A.D.3d 528 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Honkala v. Lee E. Gibson Construction Co.
300 A.D.2d 445 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Alami v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.
766 N.E.2d 574 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
Alami v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.
278 A.D.2d 262 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Gusek v. Compass Transportation Corp.
266 A.D.2d 923 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Bertrand v. Vingan
249 A.D.2d 13 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 A.D.2d 318, 663 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyland-v-calace-nyappdiv-1997.