Hyland v. Bohn Manufacturing Co.
This text of 65 N.W. 369 (Hyland v. Bohn Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs sold logs to the defendant, and retained the title to the logs and the lumber manufactured therefrom as security for the purchase money. Upon default in payment of several notes given for the purchase .money, they replevied a large quantity of the lumber, and also brought this action to recover upon one of the notes. The replevin actions are the cases of Hyland v. Bolin Mfg. Go, 92 Wis.-and-(decided at the present term).1 It appearing on the trial of this action that the plaintiffs had recovered in the replevin actions the full amount of their special interest in the lumber, judgment for the defendant was rendered in this action for that reason. This was erro-[576]*576neons. The plaintiffs’ interest in the logs was by way of security for their debt. The principle is well established that the holder of securities may pursue his remedy upon his securities and his remedy at law upon his debt at the same time. He may thus obtain two judgments, but can have but one satisfaction. Jones, Chattel Mortg. (4th ed.), § 758.
By the Ooivrt.— Judgment reversed, and action remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 N.W. 369, 91 Wis. 574, 1895 Wisc. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyland-v-bohn-manufacturing-co-wis-1895.