Hyland v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe & Railway Co.
This text of 151 P. 1107 (Hyland v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe & Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
In this action for damages the court sustained a demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence and rendered judgment for the defendants, from which judgment this appeal is taken.
The abstract contains testimony in support of the allegations of the petition as well as evidence tending to sustain the defendants’ claim of contributory negligence, but under the familiar rule conflicting evidence can not be weighed on a demurrer; even material conflict between the testimony of a party in chief and on cross-examination must be left for the jury to settle. (Acker v. Norman, 72 Kan. 586, 84 Pac. 531; Madden v. Stegman, 88 Kan. 29, 30, 127 Pac. 524; Green v. Fist, 89 Kan. 536, 540, 132 Pac. 179; Smith v. Schriver, 91 Kan. 582, 585, 138 Pac. 584; Machine Co. v. Roach, 91 Kan. 840, 842, 139 Pac. 430; Terry v. Gravel Co., 93 Kan. 125, 129, 143 Pac. 485.)
The judgment is reversed with directions to grant a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 P. 1107, 96 Kan. 432, 1915 Kan. LEXIS 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyland-v-atchison-topeka-santa-fe-railway-co-kan-1915.