Hyjack v. Nolan

381 A.2d 57, 154 N.J. Super. 173, 1977 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1160
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedDecember 1, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 381 A.2d 57 (Hyjack v. Nolan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hyjack v. Nolan, 381 A.2d 57, 154 N.J. Super. 173, 1977 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1160 (N.J. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Kentz in his opinion reported at 144 N. J. Super. 545 (Law Div. 1976).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ross v. Rupert
893 A.2d 725 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2006)
Gautam v. Conte
571 A.2d 344 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
381 A.2d 57, 154 N.J. Super. 173, 1977 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyjack-v-nolan-njsuperctappdiv-1977.