Hygrade Food Products Corp. v. Hoey

Second Circuit

Hygrade Food Products Corp. v. Hoey

80 F.2d 1012, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3330

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 17, 1936

DocketNo. 168

StatusPublished

This text of 80 F.2d 1012 (Hygrade Food Products Corp. v. Hoey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hygrade Food Products Corp. v. Hoey, 80 F.2d 1012, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3330 (2d Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Decree reversed, and cause remanded to the District Court, with directions to enter a decree enjoining collection of the tax. An appropriate order shall be entered directing the repayment to the plaintiff of any cash, bonds, or funds which have been impounded or deposited pendente lite in conformity with the order of the court below. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc., v. Fontenot, 56 S.Ct. 374, 80 L.Ed. -, January 13, 1936.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Decree reversed, and cause remanded to the District Court, with directions to enter a decree enjoining collection of the tax. An appropriate order shall be entered directing the repayment to the plaintiff of any cash, bonds, or funds which have been impounded or deposited pendente lite in conformity with the order of the court below. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc., v. Fontenot, 56 S.Ct. 374, 80 L.Ed. -, January 13, 1936.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 F.2d 1012, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hygrade-food-products-corp-v-hoey-ca2-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack