Hygrade Food Products Corp. v. Florida Livestock Board

156 So. 2d 493
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 11, 1963·No. No. 32225·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the prayer of a petition for certiorari because of an alleged conflict between the instant decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, 145 So.2d 535, and prior decisions of this Court, we issued the writ. Inasmuch as a jurisdictional conflict of decisions appeared questionable, we set the matter for hearing upon both jurisdiction and merits. Having heard oral arguments and upon further careful study of the record and briefs, we are now convinced that the District Court followed the prior decisions of this Court and did not render a decision in conflict therewith. In consequence of this view the writ of cer-tiorari heretofore issued, is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hygrade Food Products Corp. v. Florida Livestock Board, 156 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 1963).

156 So. 2d 493 (Hygrade Food Products Corp. v. Florida Livestock Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Livestock Board v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.
156 So. 2d 493 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1963)