Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hyers v. State

Hyers v. State

915 So. 2d 711, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18761, 2005 WL 3179446
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 2005·No. No. 1D05-1924·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying the motion, but do so without prejudice to appellant’s refiling his jail credit claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See Burchfield v. State, 907 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hyers v. State, 915 So. 2d 711, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18761, 2005 WL 3179446 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

915 So. 2d 711 (Hyers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burchfield v. State
907 So. 2d 614 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)