Hyer v. Burdett

1 Edw. Ch. 325, 1832 N.Y. LEXIS 214, 1832 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 36
CourtNew York Court of Chancery
DecidedApril 23, 1832
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Edw. Ch. 325 (Hyer v. Burdett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hyer v. Burdett, 1 Edw. Ch. 325, 1832 N.Y. LEXIS 214, 1832 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 36 (N.Y. 1832).

Opinion

The Vice-Chancellor.

The principal object of this suit is against the defendant Jacob Burdett. It proceeds, as to him, upon the grounds of his insolvency and a withholding of tile copartnership books. But the bill does not charge fraud or collusion between him and his surviving partner. Although Jacob Burdett may be acting fraudulently and be keeping the books from his copartner, yet this gives no right to the widow and next of kin of Garrit Hyer. In such a case, it rests with Walter E. Hyer to file a bill. He has rights as a partner. And he has also the legal title to Garrit Hyer’s share vested in him as administrator. Provided the bill had suggested a refusal on the part of Walter E. Hyer to file one, and that he was colluding with Jacob Burdett, then, I think, it might have been sustained. For these reasons and others which might be assigned, I consider the demurrer well taken.

Demurrer allowed, with costs,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valentine v. Wysor
23 N.E. 1076 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Edw. Ch. 325, 1832 N.Y. LEXIS 214, 1832 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyer-v-burdett-nychanct-1832.