Hydrox Ice Cream Co. v. Doe

250 A.D. 770, 293 N.Y.S. 1013, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8927
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 12, 1937·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Action for a permanent injunction restraining defendants from picketing the places of business of plaintiff’s customers. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite, without prejudice, and granting defendants’ cross-motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to' constitute [771]*771a cause of action, with leave to serve an amended complaint, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; the amended complaint to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. We are of opinion that this is a ease involving and growing out of a labor dispute within the provisions of section 876-a, subdivision 10, of the Civil Practice Act, and the plaintiff cannot obtain relief without complying with that section. To the extent indicated, there is no deprivation of the court’s jurisdiction. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hydrox Ice Cream Co. v. Doe, 250 A.D. 770, 293 N.Y.S. 1013, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

250 A.D. 770 (Hydrox Ice Cream Co. v. Doe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mason & Dixon Lines Inc. v. Odom
18 S.E.2d 841 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Bent Steel Sections, Inc. v. Doe
170 Misc. 736 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)