Hydrocarbon Trading & Transport Co. v. Ramco International, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hydrocarbon Trading & Transport Co. v. Ramco International, Inc.

488 So. 2d 175, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1178, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7934

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 21, 1986

DocketNo. 4-86-0574

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 488 So. 2d 175 (Hydrocarbon Trading & Transport Co. v. Ramco International, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hydrocarbon Trading & Transport Co. v. Ramco International, Inc., 488 So. 2d 175, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1178, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7934 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioners filed a writ of certiorari claiming that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law when it denied the petitioners’ motion to compel discovery. We deny the petition because the petitioners have an adequate remedy on plenary appeal. See United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. Graham, 404 So.2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), review denied sub nom, Caldwell-Scott Construction Co., Inc. v. Graham, 419 So.2d 1195 (Fla.1982), petition for review dismissed, 419 So.2d 1201 (Fla.1982). Contra Young, Stem & Tannenbaum, P.A. v. Smith, 416 So.2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

DENIED.

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petitioners filed a writ of certiorari claiming that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law when it denied the petitioners’ motion to compel discovery. We deny the petition because the petitioners have an adequate remedy on plenary appeal. See United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. Graham, 404 So.2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), review denied sub nom, Caldwell-Scott Construction Co., Inc. v. Graham, 419 So.2d 1195 (Fla.1982), petition for review dismissed, 419 So.2d 1201 (Fla.1982). Contra Young, Stem & Tannenbaum, P.A. v. Smith, 416 So.2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

DENIED.

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

488 So. 2d 175, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1178, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hydrocarbon-trading-transport-co-v-ramco-international-inc-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack