Hydro-Dyne Engineering, Inc. v. Williams, Griffith
This text of Hydro-Dyne Engineering, Inc. v. Williams, Griffith (Hydro-Dyne Engineering, Inc. v. Williams, Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
HYDRO-DYNE ENGINEERING, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL WILLIAMS, SCOTT GRIFFITH; CORNERSTONE MECHANICAL, LLC; and CORNERSTONE H20, LLC,
Appellees.
No. 2D2025-2043
April 17, 2026
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Patricia A. Muscarella, Judge.
Donald A. Mihokovich and Kenneth M. Curtin of Adams and Reese, LLP, Tampa; Elliot A. Hallak and Megan E. Knepka, admitted pro hac vice of Harris Beach Murtha Cullina, PLLC, Albany, New York, for Appellant.
Brett P. Owens of Fisher & Phillips, Tampa, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
KHOUZAM, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hydro-Dyne Engineering, Inc. v. Williams, Griffith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hydro-dyne-engineering-inc-v-williams-griffith-fladistctapp-2026.