Hyder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hyder v. State

630 So. 2d 1137, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10110, 1993 WL 394666

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 8, 1993

DocketNo. 93-02678

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 630 So. 2d 1137 (Hyder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hyder v. State, 630 So. 2d 1137, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10110, 1993 WL 394666 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Hyder appeals from an order granting in part and denying in part his motion to compel the State Attorney’s Office to provide access to public records. We treat Hyder’s appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Roesch v. State, 596 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), review granted, 617 So.2d 320 (Fla.1993).

We deny the petition because Hyder is not entitled to a copy of the State Attorney’s files free of charge. See Roesch. However, as in Roesch, we certify the following question:

WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE METHOD OF DISCLOSURE OF PUBLIC RECORDS HELD BY THE STATE ATTORNEY OR CLERK OF THE COURT WHERE THE RECORDS ARE REQUESTED BY AN UNREPRESENTED PRISONER WHO SEEKS THE RECORDS IN CONJUNCTION WITH A MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF?

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI