Hyder v. State

474 So. 2d 881, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2038, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15598
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 28, 1985·No. No. 84-2569·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record in this case supports a finding that the defendant, through his attorney, affirmatively selected to be sentenced in accord with the sentencing guidelines. See Rule 3.701, Fla.R.Crim.P. The presence of the defendant at the time his attorney announced the affirmative selection is sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the rule. See Hayward v. State, 467 So.2d 462 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Newsome v. State, 466 So.2d 411 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Moore v. State, 455 So.2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

HURLEY and BARKETT, JJ., and WES-SEL, JOHN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hyder v. State, 474 So. 2d 881, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2038, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15598 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

474 So. 2d 881 (Hyder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newsome v. State
466 So. 2d 411 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Hayward v. State
467 So. 2d 462 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Moore v. State
455 So. 2d 535 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)