Hyder v. State

104 So. 921, 20 Ala. App. 682
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 9, 1925·No. 8 Div. 339.·Published

Opinion

RICE, J.

The defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and appeals on the record proper, without bill of exceptions. There appearing no prejudicial error, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hyder v. State, 104 So. 921, 20 Ala. App. 682 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

104 So. 921 (Hyder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.