Hyde v. United States

Federal Circuit

Hyde v. United States

332 F. App'x 611

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedApril 14, 2009

DocketNo. 2009-5034

StatusPublished

This text of 332 F. App'x 611 (Hyde v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hyde v. United States, 332 F. App'x 611 (Fed. Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

LINN, Circuit Judge.

William Hyde submits a petition for a writ of mandamus and an opposition to the United States’ motion for an extension of time.

With respect to the mandamus petition, Hyde should include his arguments concerning the merits of his case in the briefs. Hyde may, if he wishes, file a reply brief within 14 days of the date of service of the United States’ brief.

Hyde’s opposition to the United States’ extension motion was not filed within the time required by Fed. R.App. P. 27(a)(3)(A). Thus, Hyde is deemed to have consented to the motion. Fed. Cir. R. 27(a)(5).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The mandamus petition is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI