Hyde v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hyde v. State

67 S.E. 684, 7 Ga. App. 595, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 409

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 6, 1910

Docket2424

StatusPublished

This text of 67 S.E. 684 (Hyde v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hyde v. State, 67 S.E. 684, 7 Ga. App. 595, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 409 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell,- J.

The defendant had a combination store and restaurant in LaGrange. The State’s witness went into the store, approached the defendant’s son, and said, “I want some liquor.” The young man said, “Iiow much?” The witness replied, “One pint.” The young man said, “It will cost you seventy-ñve cents.” The witness then handed the young man seventy-five cents, and was told by him to wait a moment there where he was, in the rear of the restaurant. The young man to whom the money had been given then went to the front of the restaurant, to where his father, the present defendant, was, and leaned over the counter and said something to him, and the latter went to the rear of the restaurant and delivered a pint of whisky to the witness. The defendant had received that day a package marked “glass,” and he admitted, after his arrest, that he had received twelve pints of whisky. Pather and son were both guilty. Loeb v. State, 6 Ga. App. 23 (64 S. E. 338); Stradley v. Atlanta, ante, 441 (67 S. E. 107).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell,- J.

The defendant had a combination store and restaurant in LaGrange. The State’s witness went into the store, approached the defendant’s son, and said, “I want some liquor.” The young man said, “Iiow much?” The witness replied, “One pint.” The young man said, “It will cost you seventy-ñve cents.” The witness then handed the young man seventy-five cents, and was told by him to wait a moment there where he was, in the rear of the restaurant. The young man to whom the money had been given then went to the front of the restaurant, to where his father, the present defendant, was, and leaned over the counter and said something to him, and the latter went to the rear of the restaurant and delivered a pint of whisky to the witness. The defendant had received that day a package marked “glass,” and he admitted, after his arrest, that he had received twelve pints of whisky. Pather and son were both guilty. Loeb v. State, 6 Ga. App. 23 (64 S. E. 338); Stradley v. Atlanta, ante, 441 (67 S. E. 107).

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 S.E. 684, 7 Ga. App. 595, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hyde-v-state-gactapp-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack